feli
78
Ana!
fully before In Majesty's Minister that previously, and also detailed the great claims which Kwok Cheong had personally acquired by previous services, rendered at critical times and at much personal risk, to Her Majesty's Government. Above all I put forward the fact that the Attorney General's fresh opinion from whom I enclose - clear it that, under the facts stated, the confiscation was illegal because the vessel being in a treaty Port, though prima facie just cause of seizure, might be satisfactorily explained, and the evidence produced, if true, did so explain it.
19.
Inclosure in Sir Rutherford Alcock's reply, and if it would be regarded on the case, or adducing any sufficient legal grounds, or from controverted facts, I should be sorry to occupy my time with writing, or Your Graces with reading another communication on the subject.
So far from regarding Sir Rutherford Alcock's reply as satisfactory in any way it seems to me altogether feeble and inconsequent in its reasoning. I do not think it sufficient to be told that no person but Her Majesty's Secretary of State can "call in question official acts of Her Majesty's Minister and Consuls in China. I presume that they are only men like myself, and like myself invested, with
14.
feli
78
Ana!
fully before In Majesty's Minister thar presviously, and also detailed the great
daims which Kwoka
Cheong had personally
acquired by previous services, rendered at critical times and at much personal risse, to Wu. Majesty's Government. Above all I
Wo
put forward the fact that the Altomey General-
a
Was
fresh opinion from whom I enclose-
clear itrat, under the facts stated, the
on fiscation
Mrao
illegal because the veselé
being in a treaty Port, strough prime facix
just
canoc
Λ
of seizure, might be satisfactorily
explained, and the evidence produced, if
true, did so
19.
In
explain it.
Mew
Indore Sir Pucherford
Enclosure Mt.
Enclave & Jun
Aler's reply, and if it would be regarded on th
Wo
deating at all fairly with the facts of
•
Aeas an
the case, or adducing any sufficient for regarding the claims of throk a cheong to redress as finally disposed of winter
ow
legal grounds, or from controvated facts, I
should be
uny sorry
to occupy my
oon time
with writing, or Your Graces with reading another communication on the subject.
1
So far from regarding Sie Rustierford. Alcock's reply as satisfactory in sicher way it seems to me altogether feeble and inconect
in its reasoning. I do not thinse it sufficient to be told that no person but Her Majesty's Secretary of State
#
can "call
in question official acts of Her Majesty's
Minister and Consuls in China. I
presume that itey
ar
only
men like
myself, and like myself inverted, with
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.